A pair each age 38 with 2 younger kids (ages 4 and 6) are considering whether or not to promote their absolutely paid up funding property valued at $3.5m?

In the event that they have been to promote the mentioned property, the spouse may turn out to be a keep at residence mother. 

The opposite choice is to maintain the property and proceed to have twin revenue.

Part of the remark:

I’m publishing my reply to this remark as a weblog to see what others should say since I haven’t got all of the solutions.

What do I believe?

That is my reply:

“Congratulations to this couple as a result of what they’ve is a primary world “downside.” 

“I can’t present a solution as to which choice is healthier as a result of all of it boils down to what’s extra essential to the couple at this level.

“The selection shouldn’t be between two evils and to find out which is the lesser evil right here.

“The selection is between two outcomes that are good in their very own methods. 

“Is time spent with the youngsters of their early life extra essential or is bigger certainty in cash making extra essential?

“What I do know is that youngsters develop up very quick.

“Rising up, I did not get to spend a lot time with my dad and mom as each of them needed to work lengthy hours.

“If our household had been financially higher off, then, issues might need been completely different.

“Taking the emotions of kids into consideration in monetary issues is a luxurious for many households however for this household, it may very well be a luxurious which is reasonably priced.

“Now we have to ask how a lot is sufficient and I can solely converse for myself.” 

Lately revealed:
Keep away from this when rates of interest rise.

References: 

1. When can I give up my full time job? 

2. My household virtually went bankrupt.

3. Monetary freedom and never sufficient time.